[removed]BOWMAN V. MONSANTO, ET AL. DECISION BELOW: 657 F.3d 1341 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Patent exhaustion delimits rights of patent holders by eliminating the right to control

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

12-3 LAWSON V. FMR, LLC DECISION BELOW: 670 F.3d 61 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, forbids a publicly traded

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]CHAMBERS V. UNITED STATES DECISION BELOW: 473 F3d 724 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a defendant’s failure to report for confinement “involves conduct that presents a serious po

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

132 ORIG ALABAMA V. NORTH CAROLINA DECISION BELOW: LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: QUESTION PRESENTED: Plaintiffs except to the following conclusions of the Special Master: 1. Article 7(F) of the Southeast Interstate Low-Level

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

• Motion
• Interstate compact

[removed]PPL MONTANA, LLC V. MONTANA DECISION BELOW: 229 P.3d 421 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: DA[removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: The Montana Supreme Court held on a summary judgment record that the State of

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

• Black Eagle Dam
• Montana
• Navigability
• State governments of the United States

[removed]NICKOLS V. MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION DECISION BELOW: 720 F.3d 966 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: The Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551-59, "established the maximum

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

• Rulemaking
• Administrative Procedure Act
• Government
• Administrative law
• Notice
• Notice of proposed rulemaking
• United States administrative law
• Law
• Politics of the United States

[removed]PENN PLAZA LLC V. PYETT DECISION BELOW: 498 F 3d 88 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed], [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Is an arbitration clause contained in a collective bargaining agreement, freely negotiated by a

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]ARIZONA V. GANT DECISION BELOW: 216 Ariz. 1 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: CR[removed]PR QUESTION PRESENTED: In New York v. Belton, 453 U.S[removed]), this Court held that the risks to officer safety and to the preser

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

• Arizona v. Gant
• New York v. Belton
• Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
• Searches incident to a lawful arrest
• Search warrant
• Thornton v. United States
• Searches and seizures
• Law
• Case law

[removed]MICHIGAN V. BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY DECISION BELOW: 695 F.3d 406 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. (IGRA), authorizes an Indian

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY OF MARYLAND V. WYNNE DECISION BELOW: 431 Md. 147 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 107, September Term, 2011 QUESTION PRESENTED: Does the United States Constitution prohibit a state from taxing

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov